Graduate Fellowship to Alexander Etz

AgencyNational Science Foundation
PanelGraduate Research Fellowship Program
LocationUniversity of California, Irvine
Start dateOctober 2017
End dateSeptember 2020
Budget$ 132,000.00
Agency codeDGE-1321846
LeadAlexander Etz
OtherJoachim Vandekerckhove

Publications

Etz, A., Goodman, S. N., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2022). Statistical inference in behavioral research: traditional and Bayesian approaches. Research Integrity: Best Practices for the Social and Behavioral Sciences.
Etz, A., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2018). Introduction to Bayesian inference for psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 5–34.
Etz, A., Haaf, J., Rouder, J., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2018). Bayesian inference and testing any hypothesis you can specify. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1, 281–295.
Etz, A. (2018). Introduction to the concept of likelihood and its applications. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1, 60–69.
Etz, A., Gronau, Q., Dablander, F., Edelsbrunner, P., & Baribault, B. (2018). How to become a Bayesian in eight easy steps: An annotated reading list. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 219–234.
Ly, A., Etz, A., Marsman, M., & Wagenmakers, E. (2018). Replication Bayes factors from evidence updating. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 2498–2508.
Zwaan, R., Etz, A., Lucas, R., & Donnellan, M. (2018). Improving social and behavioral science by making replication mainstream: A response to commentaries. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, e157.
Ly, A., Raj, A., Etz, A., Marsman, M., & Wagenmakers, E. (2018). Bayesian reanalyses from summary statistics: A guide for academic consumers. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1, 367–374.
Zwaan, R., Etz, A., Lucas, R., & Donnellan, M. (2018). Making replication mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, e120.
Etz, A., & Wagenmakers, E. (2017). J. B. S. Haldane's contribution to the Bayes factor hypothesis test. Statistical Science, 32, 313–329.
Lakens, D., & Etz, A. (2017). Too true to be bad: When sets of studies with significant and non-significant findings are probably true. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 875–881.