Publications

     

Discussion points for Bayesian inference

Why is there no consensual way of conducting Bayesian analyses? We present a summary of agreements and disagreements of the authors on several discussion points regarding Bayesian inference. We also provide a thinking guideline to assist researchers in conducting Bayesian inference in the social and behavioural sciences. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-019-0807-z

Citation

Aczel, B., Hoekstra, R., Gelman, A., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Klugkist, I. G., Rouder, J. N., Vandekerckhove, J., Lee, M. D., Morey, R. D., Vanpaemel, W., Dienes, Z., & van Ravenzwaaij, D. (2020). Discussion points for Bayesian inference. Nature Human Behavior, 4, 561–563.

BibTeX

@article{aczel2020discussion,
  title     = {Discussion points for Bayesian inference},
  author    = {Aczel, B. and Hoekstra, R. and Gelman, A. and Wagenmakers, E.-J. and Klugkist, I. G. and Rouder, J. N. and Vandekerckhove, J. and Lee, M. D. and Morey, R. D. and Vanpaemel, W. and Dienes, Z. and van Ravenzwaaij, D.},
  journal   = {Nature Human Behavior},
  year      = {2020},
  volume    = {4},
  pages     = {561--563},
  doi       = {10.1038/s41562-019-0807-z},
}