Discussion points for Bayesian inference

Abstract

Why is there no consensual way of conducting Bayesian analyses? We present a summary of agreements and disagreements of the authors on several discussion points regarding Bayesian inference. We also provide a thinking guideline to assist researchers in conducting Bayesian inference in the social and behavioural sciences.

Citation

Aczel, B., Hoekstra, R., Gelman, A., Wagenmakers, E., Klugkist, I., Rouder, J., Vandekerckhove, J., Lee, M., Morey, R., Vanpaemel, W., Dienes, Z., & van Ravenzwaaij, D. (2020). Discussion points for Bayesian inference. Nature Human Behavior, 4, 561–563.

Bibtex

@article{aczel_etal:2020:Discussion,
    title   = {{D}iscussion points for {B}ayesian inference},
    author  = {Aczel, Balazs and Hoekstra, Rink and Gelman, Andrew and Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan and Klugkist, Irene and Rouder, Jeffrey and Vandekerckhove, Joachim and Lee, Michael and Morey, Richard and Vanpaemel, Wolf and Dienes, Zoltan and van Ravenzwaaij, Don},
    year    = {2020},
    journal = {Nature Human Behavior},
    volume  = {4},
    pages   = {561--563}
}