Ellis, J. E., Parker, T. W., Vandekerckhove, J., Murphy, B. J., & Smith, S. (in press). An experimentation infrastructure for quantitative measurements of cyber resilience. IEEE Military Communications Conference Proceedings.
Sun, Q., Vo, K., Lui, K. K., Nunez, M., Vandekerckhove, J., & Srinivasan, R. (in press). Decision SincNet: Neurocognitive models of decision making that predict cognitive processes from neural signals. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks.
Kott, A., Weisman, M. J., & Vandekerckhove, J. (in press). Mathematical modeling of cyber resilience. IEEE Military Communications Conference Proceedings.
Etz, A., Goodman, S. N., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2022). Statistical inference in behavioral research: traditional and Bayesian approaches. Research Integrity: Best Practices for the Social and Behavioral Sciences.
Morey, R., Kaschak, M. P., Diez-Álamo, A. M., Glenberg, A. M., Zwaan, R., Lakens, D., Ibáñez, A., Garcia, A., Gianelli, C., Jones, J. L., Madden, J., Alifano, F., Bergen, B., Bloxsom, N. G., Bub, D. N., Cai, Z. G., Chartier, C. R., Chatterjee, A., Conwell, E., Cook, S. W., Davis, J. D., Evers, E., Girard, S., Harter, D., Hartung, F., Herrera, E., Huettig, F., Humphries, S., Juanchich, M., Kühne, K., Lu, S., Lynes, T., Masson, M. E., Ostarek, M., Pessers, S., Reglin, R., Steegen, S., Thiessen, E. D., Thomas, L. E., Trott, S., Vandekerckhove, J., Vanpaemel, W., Vlachou, M., Williams, K., & Ziv-Crispel, N. (2022). A pre-registered, multi-lab non-replication of the Action-sentence Compatibility Effect (ACE). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29, 1239.
Wiech, K., Eippert, F., Vandekerckhove, J., Zaman, J., Placek, K., Tuerlinckx, F., Vlaeyen, J., & Tracey, I. (2022). Cortico-brainstem mechanisms of biased perceptual decision-making in the context of pain. Journal of Pain, 23, 1372.
Lucio, P., Vandekerckhove, J., Polanczyk, G., & Cogo-Moreira, H. (2021). Is it worthwhile to take account of "guessing" in the performance of the Raven test? Calling for the principle of parsimony for test validation. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 39, 100–111.
Devezer, B., Navarro, D. J., Vandekerckhove, J., & Buzbas, E. O. (2021). The case for formal methodology in scientific reform. Royal Society Open Science, 8, 200805.
Shiffrin, R. M., Matzke, D., Crystal, J. D., Wagenmakers, E., Chandramouli, S. H., Vandekerckhove, J., Zorzi, M., Morey, R., & Murphy, M. C. (2021). Extraordinary claims, extraordinary evidence? A discussion. Learning & Behavior, 49, 540.
Lui, K. K., Nunez, M., Cassidy, J. M., Vandekerckhove, J., Cramer, S. C., & Srinivasan, R. (2021). Timing of readiness potentials reflect a decision-making process in the human brain. Computational Brain & Behavior, 4, 547.
van den Bergh, D., Bogaerts, S., Spreen, M., Flohr, R., Vandekerckhove, J., Rhemtulla, M., Batchelder, W., & Wagenmakers, E. (2020). Cultural consensus theory for the evaluation of patients' mental health scores in forensic psychiatric hospitals. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 98, 102383.
Oravecz, Z., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2020). A joint process model of consensus and longitudinal dynamics. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 98, 102386.
Aczel, B., Hoekstra, R., Gelman, A., Wagenmakers, E., Klugkist, I., Rouder, J., Vandekerckhove, J., Lee, M., Morey, R., Vanpaemel, W., Dienes, Z., & van Ravenzwaaij, D. (2020). Discussion points for Bayesian inference. Nature Human Behavior, 4, 561–563.
Oravecz, Z., Dirsmith, J., Heshmati, S., Vandekerckhove, J., & Brick, T. (2020). Psychological well-being and personality traits are associated with experiencing love in everyday life. Personality and Individual Differences, 154, 109620.
Heshmati, S., Oravecz, Z., Pressman, S., Batchelder, W., Muth, C., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2019). What does it mean to feel loved? Cultural agreement and individual differences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36, 214-243.
Dutilh, G., Annis, J., Brown, S., Cassey, P., Evans, N., Grasman, R., Hawkins, G., Heathcote, A., Holmes, W., Krypotos, A., Kupitz, C., Leite, F., Lerche, V., Lin, Y., Logan, G., Palmeri, T., Starns, J., Trueblood, J., van Maanen, L., van Ravenzwaaij, D., Vandekerckhove, J., Visser, I., Voss, A., White, C., Wiecki, T., Rieskamp, J., & Donkin, C. (2019). The quality of response time data inference: A blinded, collaborative approach to the validity of cognitive models. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26, 1051–1069.
Lee, M., Criss, A., Devezer, B., Donkin, C., Etz, A., Leite, F., Matzke, D., Rouder, J., Trueblood, J., White, C., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2019). Robust modeling in cognitive science. Computational Brain & Behavior, 2, 141–153.
Vandekerckhove, J., White, C., Trueblood, J., Rouder, J., Matzke, D., Leite, F., Etz, A., Donkin, C., Devezer, B., Criss, A., & Lee, M. (2019). Robust diversity in cognitive science. Computational Brain & Behavior, 2, 271–276.
Nunez, M., Gosai, A., Vandekerckhove, J., & Srinivasan, R. (2019). The latency of a visual evoked potential tracks the onset of decision making. NeuroImage, 197, 93–108.
Wagenmakers, E., Love, J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q., Dropmann, D., Boutin, B., Meerhol, F., Knight, P., Raj, A., van Kesteren, E., van Doorn, J., Smira, M., Epskamp, S., Etz, A., Matzke, D., Rouder, J., & Morey, R. (2018). Bayesian Inference for Psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 58–76.
Rouder, J., Haaf, J., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2018). Bayesian Inference in Psychology, Part IV: Parameter estimation and Bayes factors. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 102–113.
Baribault, B., Donkin, C., Little, D., Trueblood, J., Oravecz, Z., van Ravenzwaaij, D., White, C., De Boeck, P., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2018). Metastudies for robust tests of theory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115, 2607–2612.
Vandekerckhove, J., Rouder, J., & Kruschke, J. (2018). Editorial: Bayesian methods for advancing psychological science. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 1–4.
Etz, A., Haaf, J., Rouder, J., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2018). Bayesian inference and testing any hypothesis you can specify. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1, 281–295.
Etz, A., (2018). Introduction to the concept of likelihood and its applications. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1, 60–69.
Mistry, P., Pothos, E., Vandekerckhove, J., & Trueblood, J. (2018). A quantum probability account of individual differences in causal reasoning. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 87, 76–97.
Etz, A., Gronau, Q., Dablander, F., Edelsbrunner, P., & Baribault, B. (2018). How to become a Bayesian in eight easy steps: An annotated reading list. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 219–234.
Ly, A., Etz, A., Marsman, M., & Wagenmakers, E. (2018). Replication Bayes factors from evidence updating. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 2498–2508.
Zwaan, R., Etz, A., Lucas, R., & Donnellan, M. (2018). Improving social and behavioral science by making replication mainstream: A response to commentaries. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, e157.
Ly, A., Raj, A., Etz, A., Marsman, M., & Wagenmakers, E. (2018). Bayesian reanalyses from summary statistics: A guide for academic consumers. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1, 367–374.
Zwaan, R., Etz, A., Lucas, R., & Donnellan, M. (2018). Making replication mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, e120.
Matzke, D., Boehm, U., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2018). Bayesian Inference in Psychology, Part III: Bayesian parameter estimation in nonstandard models. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 77–101.
Etz, A., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2018). Introduction to Bayesian inference for psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 5–34.
Shafer-Skelton, A., Kupitz, C., & Golomb, J. (2017). Object-location binding across a saccade: A retinotopic spatial congruency bias. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79, 765–781.
Bapat, A., Shafer-Skelton, A., Kupitz, C., & Golomb, J. (2017). Binding object features to locations: Does the "spatial congruency bias" update with object movement?. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79, 1682–1694.
Lucio, P., Salum, G., Rohde, L., Gadelha, A., Swardfager, W., Vandekerckhove, J., Pan, P., Polanczyk, G., do Rosario, M., Jackowski, A., Mari, J., & Cogo-Moreira, H. (2017). Poor stimulus discriminability as a common neuropsychological deficit between ADHD and reading ability in young children: a moderated mediation model. Psychological Medicine, 47, 255–266.
van Ravenzwaaij, D., Donkin, C., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2017). The EZ diffusion model provides a powerful test of simple empirical effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 547–556.
Dutilh, G., Vandekerckhove, J., Ly, A., Matzke, D., Pedroni, A., Frey, R., Rieskamp, J., & Wagenmakers, E. (2017). A test of the diffusion model explanation for the Worst Performance Rule using preregistration and blinding. Attention, Perception, and Performance, 79, 713–725.
Lakens, D., & Etz, A. (2017). Too true to be bad: When sets of studies with significant and non-significant findings are probably true. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 875–881.
Etz, A., & Wagenmakers, E. (2017). J. B. S. Haldane's contribution to the Bayes factor hypothesis test. Statistical Science, 32, 313–329.
Nunez, M., Nunez, P., & Srinivasan, R. (2016). Electroencephalography (EEG): neurophysics, experimental methods, and signal processing. Handbook of Neuroimaging Data Analysis, 175–197.
Holcombe, A., Brown, N., Goodbourn, P., Etz, A., & Geukes, S. (2016). Does sadness impair color perception? Flawed evidence and faulty methods. F1000Research.
Oravecz, Z., Huentelman, M., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2016). Sequential Bayesian updating for Big Data. Big Data in Cognitive Science: From Methods to Insights, 13–33.
Guan, M., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2016). A Bayesian approach to mitigation of publication bias. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 74–86.
Oravecz, Z., Tuerlinckx, F., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2016). Bayesian data analysis with the bivariate hierarchical Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process model. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51, 106–119.
Guan, M., Lee, M., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2015). A hierarchical cognitive threshold model of human decision making on different length optimal stopping problems. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 824–829.
Kupitz, C., Buschkuehl, M., Jaeggi, S., Jonides, J., Shah, P., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2015). A diffusion model account of the transfer-of-training effect. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
Van Elk, M., Matzke, D., Gronau, Q., Guan, M., Vandekerckhove, J., & Wagenmakers, E. (2015). Meta-analyses are no substitute for registered replications: a skeptical perspective on religious priming. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1365.
Subiaul, F., Krajkowski, E., Price, E., & Etz, A. (2015). Imitation by combination: Preschool age children evidence summative imitation in a novel problem-solving task. Frontiers in Psychology, 6.
Vandekerckhove, J., Matzke, D., & Wagenmakers, E. (2015). Model comparison and the principle of parsimony. Oxford Handbook of Computational and Mathematical Psychology, 300–317.
Mistry, P., Trueblood, J., Vandekerckhove, J., & Pothos, E. (2015). A latent-mixture quantum probability model of causal reasoning within a Bayesian inference framework. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
Salum, G., Sergeant, J., Sonuga-Barke, E., Vandekerckhove, J., Gadelha, A., Pan, P., Moriyama, T., Graeff-Martins, A., Gomes de Alvarenga, P., do Rosario, M., Manfro, G., Polanczyk, G., & Rohde, L. (2014). Specificity of basic information processing and inhibitory control in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Psychological Medicine, 44, 617–631.
Salum, G., Sergeant, J., Sonuga-Barke, E., Vandekerckhove, J., Gadelha, A., Pan, P., Moriyama, T., Graeff-Martins, A., Gomes de Alvarenga, P., do Rosario, M., Manfro, G., Polanczyk, G., & Rohde, L. (2014). Mechanisms underpinning inattention and hyperactivity: neurocognitive support for ADHD dimensionality. Psychological Medicine, 44, 3189–3201.
Guan, M., Lee, M., & Silva, A. (2014). Threshold models of human decision making on optimal stopping problems in different environments. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
Oravecz, Z., Vandekerckhove, J., & Batchelder, W. (2014). Bayesian Cultural Consensus Theory. Field Methods, 26, 207–222.
Wiech, K., Vandekerckhove, J., Zaman, J., Tuerlinckx, F., Vlaeyen, J., & Tracey, I. (2014). Influence of prior information on pain involves biased perceptual decision-making. Current Biology, 24, R679–R681.
Murphy, P., Vandekerckhove, J., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2014). Pupil-linked arousal determines variability in perceptual decision making. PLOS Computational Biology, 10, e1003854.
Lee, M., Newell, B., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2014). Modeling the adaptation of search termination in human decision making. Decision, 1, 223–251.
Zhang, S., Lee, M., Vandekerckhove, J., Maris, G., & Wagenmakers, E. (2014). Time-varying boundaries for diffusion models of decision making and response time. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1364.
Dutilh, G., Forstmann, B., Vandekerckhove, J., & Wagenmakers, E. (2013). A diffusion model account of age differences in posterror slowing. Psychology and Aging, 28, 64–76.
Chubb, C., Dickson, C., Dean, T., Fagan, C., Mann, D., Wright, C., Guan, M., Silva, A., Gregersen, P., & Kowalsky, E. (2013). Bimodal distribution of performance in discriminating major/minor modes. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134, 3067–3078.
Dutilh, G., Vandekerckhove, J., Forstmann, B., Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & Wagenmakers, E. (2012). Testing theories of post-error slowing. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 7, 454–465.
Oravecz, Z., Tuerlinckx, F., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2011). A hierarchical latent stochastic differential equation model for affective dynamics. Psychological Methods, 16, 468–490.
Vandekerckhove, J., Tuerlinckx, F., & Lee, M. (2011). Hierarchical diffusion models for two-choice response times. Psychological Methods, 16, 44–62.
Vandekerckhove, J., Verheyen, S., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2010). A crossed random effects diffusion model for speeded semantic categorization data. Acta Psychologica, 133, 269–282.
Wetzels, R., Vandekerckhove, J., Tuerlinckx, F., & Wagenmakers, E. (2010). Bayesian parameter estimation in the Expectancy Valence model of the Iowa gambling task. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54, 14–27.
Dutilh, G., Vandekerckhove, J., Tuerlinckx, F., & Wagenmakers, E. (2009). A diffusion model decomposition of the practice effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 1026–1036.
Oravecz, Z., Tuerlinckx, F., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2009). A hierarchical Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model for continuous repeated measurement data. Psychometrika, 74, 395–418.
Panis, S., De Winter, J., Vandekerckhove, J., & Wagemans, J. (2008). Identification of everyday objects on the basis of fragmented versions of outlines. Perception, 37, 271–289.
Vandekerckhove, J., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2008). Diffusion Model Analysis with MATLAB: A DMAT Primer. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 61–72.
Vandekerckhove, J., Tuerlinckx, F., & Lee, M. (2008). A Bayesian approach to diffusion process models of decision-making. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 1429–1434.
Vandekerckhove, J., Panis, S., & Wagemans, J. (2007). The concavity effect is a compound of local and global effects. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 1253–1260.
Spruyt, A., Hermans, D., De Houwer, J., Vandekerckhove, J., & Eelen, P. (2007). On the predictive validity of indirect attitude measures: Prediction of consumer choice behavior on the basis of affective priming in the picture--picture naming task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 599–610.
Vandekerckhove, J., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2007). Fitting the Ratcliff diffusion model to experimental data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 1011–1026.
Ellis, J. E., Parker, T. W., Vandekerckhove, J., Murphy, B. J., & Smith, S. (in press). An experimentation infrastructure for quantitative measurements of cyber resilience. IEEE Military Communications Conference Proceedings.
Sun, Q., Vo, K., Lui, K. K., Nunez, M., Vandekerckhove, J., & Srinivasan, R. (in press). Decision SincNet: Neurocognitive models of decision making that predict cognitive processes from neural signals. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks.
Kott, A., Weisman, M. J., & Vandekerckhove, J. (in press). Mathematical modeling of cyber resilience. IEEE Military Communications Conference Proceedings.
Etz, A., Goodman, S. N., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2022). Statistical inference in behavioral research: traditional and Bayesian approaches. Research Integrity: Best Practices for the Social and Behavioral Sciences.
Morey, R., Kaschak, M. P., Diez-Álamo, A. M., Glenberg, A. M., Zwaan, R., Lakens, D., Ibáñez, A., Garcia, A., Gianelli, C., Jones, J. L., Madden, J., Alifano, F., Bergen, B., Bloxsom, N. G., Bub, D. N., Cai, Z. G., Chartier, C. R., Chatterjee, A., Conwell, E., Cook, S. W., Davis, J. D., Evers, E., Girard, S., Harter, D., Hartung, F., Herrera, E., Huettig, F., Humphries, S., Juanchich, M., Kühne, K., Lu, S., Lynes, T., Masson, M. E., Ostarek, M., Pessers, S., Reglin, R., Steegen, S., Thiessen, E. D., Thomas, L. E., Trott, S., Vandekerckhove, J., Vanpaemel, W., Vlachou, M., Williams, K., & Ziv-Crispel, N. (2022). A pre-registered, multi-lab non-replication of the Action-sentence Compatibility Effect (ACE). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29, 1239.
Wiech, K., Eippert, F., Vandekerckhove, J., Zaman, J., Placek, K., Tuerlinckx, F., Vlaeyen, J., & Tracey, I. (2022). Cortico-brainstem mechanisms of biased perceptual decision-making in the context of pain. Journal of Pain, 23, 1372.
Lucio, P., Vandekerckhove, J., Polanczyk, G., & Cogo-Moreira, H. (2021). Is it worthwhile to take account of "guessing" in the performance of the Raven test? Calling for the principle of parsimony for test validation. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 39, 100–111.
Devezer, B., Navarro, D. J., Vandekerckhove, J., & Buzbas, E. O. (2021). The case for formal methodology in scientific reform. Royal Society Open Science, 8, 200805.
Shiffrin, R. M., Matzke, D., Crystal, J. D., Wagenmakers, E., Chandramouli, S. H., Vandekerckhove, J., Zorzi, M., Morey, R., & Murphy, M. C. (2021). Extraordinary claims, extraordinary evidence? A discussion. Learning & Behavior, 49, 540.
Lui, K. K., Nunez, M., Cassidy, J. M., Vandekerckhove, J., Cramer, S. C., & Srinivasan, R. (2021). Timing of readiness potentials reflect a decision-making process in the human brain. Computational Brain & Behavior, 4, 547.
van den Bergh, D., Bogaerts, S., Spreen, M., Flohr, R., Vandekerckhove, J., Rhemtulla, M., Batchelder, W., & Wagenmakers, E. (2020). Cultural consensus theory for the evaluation of patients' mental health scores in forensic psychiatric hospitals. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 98, 102383.
Oravecz, Z., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2020). A joint process model of consensus and longitudinal dynamics. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 98, 102386.
Aczel, B., Hoekstra, R., Gelman, A., Wagenmakers, E., Klugkist, I., Rouder, J., Vandekerckhove, J., Lee, M., Morey, R., Vanpaemel, W., Dienes, Z., & van Ravenzwaaij, D. (2020). Discussion points for Bayesian inference. Nature Human Behavior, 4, 561–563.
Oravecz, Z., Dirsmith, J., Heshmati, S., Vandekerckhove, J., & Brick, T. (2020). Psychological well-being and personality traits are associated with experiencing love in everyday life. Personality and Individual Differences, 154, 109620.
Heshmati, S., Oravecz, Z., Pressman, S., Batchelder, W., Muth, C., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2019). What does it mean to feel loved? Cultural agreement and individual differences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36, 214-243.
Dutilh, G., Annis, J., Brown, S., Cassey, P., Evans, N., Grasman, R., Hawkins, G., Heathcote, A., Holmes, W., Krypotos, A., Kupitz, C., Leite, F., Lerche, V., Lin, Y., Logan, G., Palmeri, T., Starns, J., Trueblood, J., van Maanen, L., van Ravenzwaaij, D., Vandekerckhove, J., Visser, I., Voss, A., White, C., Wiecki, T., Rieskamp, J., & Donkin, C. (2019). The quality of response time data inference: A blinded, collaborative approach to the validity of cognitive models. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26, 1051–1069.
Lee, M., Criss, A., Devezer, B., Donkin, C., Etz, A., Leite, F., Matzke, D., Rouder, J., Trueblood, J., White, C., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2019). Robust modeling in cognitive science. Computational Brain & Behavior, 2, 141–153.
Vandekerckhove, J., White, C., Trueblood, J., Rouder, J., Matzke, D., Leite, F., Etz, A., Donkin, C., Devezer, B., Criss, A., & Lee, M. (2019). Robust diversity in cognitive science. Computational Brain & Behavior, 2, 271–276.
Nunez, M., Gosai, A., Vandekerckhove, J., & Srinivasan, R. (2019). The latency of a visual evoked potential tracks the onset of decision making. NeuroImage, 197, 93–108.
Wagenmakers, E., Love, J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q., Dropmann, D., Boutin, B., Meerhol, F., Knight, P., Raj, A., van Kesteren, E., van Doorn, J., Smira, M., Epskamp, S., Etz, A., Matzke, D., Rouder, J., & Morey, R. (2018). Bayesian Inference for Psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 58–76.
Rouder, J., Haaf, J., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2018). Bayesian Inference in Psychology, Part IV: Parameter estimation and Bayes factors. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 102–113.
Baribault, B., Donkin, C., Little, D., Trueblood, J., Oravecz, Z., van Ravenzwaaij, D., White, C., De Boeck, P., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2018). Metastudies for robust tests of theory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115, 2607–2612.
Vandekerckhove, J., Rouder, J., & Kruschke, J. (2018). Editorial: Bayesian methods for advancing psychological science. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 1–4.
Etz, A., Haaf, J., Rouder, J., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2018). Bayesian inference and testing any hypothesis you can specify. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1, 281–295.
Etz, A., (2018). Introduction to the concept of likelihood and its applications. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1, 60–69.
Mistry, P., Pothos, E., Vandekerckhove, J., & Trueblood, J. (2018). A quantum probability account of individual differences in causal reasoning. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 87, 76–97.
Etz, A., Gronau, Q., Dablander, F., Edelsbrunner, P., & Baribault, B. (2018). How to become a Bayesian in eight easy steps: An annotated reading list. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 219–234.
Ly, A., Etz, A., Marsman, M., & Wagenmakers, E. (2018). Replication Bayes factors from evidence updating. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 2498–2508.
Zwaan, R., Etz, A., Lucas, R., & Donnellan, M. (2018). Improving social and behavioral science by making replication mainstream: A response to commentaries. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, e157.
Ly, A., Raj, A., Etz, A., Marsman, M., & Wagenmakers, E. (2018). Bayesian reanalyses from summary statistics: A guide for academic consumers. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1, 367–374.
Zwaan, R., Etz, A., Lucas, R., & Donnellan, M. (2018). Making replication mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, e120.
Matzke, D., Boehm, U., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2018). Bayesian Inference in Psychology, Part III: Bayesian parameter estimation in nonstandard models. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 77–101.
Etz, A., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2018). Introduction to Bayesian inference for psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 5–34.
Shafer-Skelton, A., Kupitz, C., & Golomb, J. (2017). Object-location binding across a saccade: A retinotopic spatial congruency bias. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79, 765–781.
Bapat, A., Shafer-Skelton, A., Kupitz, C., & Golomb, J. (2017). Binding object features to locations: Does the "spatial congruency bias" update with object movement?. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79, 1682–1694.
Lucio, P., Salum, G., Rohde, L., Gadelha, A., Swardfager, W., Vandekerckhove, J., Pan, P., Polanczyk, G., do Rosario, M., Jackowski, A., Mari, J., & Cogo-Moreira, H. (2017). Poor stimulus discriminability as a common neuropsychological deficit between ADHD and reading ability in young children: a moderated mediation model. Psychological Medicine, 47, 255–266.
van Ravenzwaaij, D., Donkin, C., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2017). The EZ diffusion model provides a powerful test of simple empirical effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 547–556.
Dutilh, G., Vandekerckhove, J., Ly, A., Matzke, D., Pedroni, A., Frey, R., Rieskamp, J., & Wagenmakers, E. (2017). A test of the diffusion model explanation for the Worst Performance Rule using preregistration and blinding. Attention, Perception, and Performance, 79, 713–725.
Lakens, D., & Etz, A. (2017). Too true to be bad: When sets of studies with significant and non-significant findings are probably true. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 875–881.
Etz, A., & Wagenmakers, E. (2017). J. B. S. Haldane's contribution to the Bayes factor hypothesis test. Statistical Science, 32, 313–329.
Nunez, M., Nunez, P., & Srinivasan, R. (2016). Electroencephalography (EEG): neurophysics, experimental methods, and signal processing. Handbook of Neuroimaging Data Analysis, 175–197.
Holcombe, A., Brown, N., Goodbourn, P., Etz, A., & Geukes, S. (2016). Does sadness impair color perception? Flawed evidence and faulty methods. F1000Research.
Oravecz, Z., Huentelman, M., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2016). Sequential Bayesian updating for Big Data. Big Data in Cognitive Science: From Methods to Insights, 13–33.
Guan, M., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2016). A Bayesian approach to mitigation of publication bias. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 74–86.
Oravecz, Z., Tuerlinckx, F., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2016). Bayesian data analysis with the bivariate hierarchical Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process model. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51, 106–119.
Guan, M., Lee, M., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2015). A hierarchical cognitive threshold model of human decision making on different length optimal stopping problems. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 824–829.
Kupitz, C., Buschkuehl, M., Jaeggi, S., Jonides, J., Shah, P., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2015). A diffusion model account of the transfer-of-training effect. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
Van Elk, M., Matzke, D., Gronau, Q., Guan, M., Vandekerckhove, J., & Wagenmakers, E. (2015). Meta-analyses are no substitute for registered replications: a skeptical perspective on religious priming. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1365.
Subiaul, F., Krajkowski, E., Price, E., & Etz, A. (2015). Imitation by combination: Preschool age children evidence summative imitation in a novel problem-solving task. Frontiers in Psychology, 6.
Vandekerckhove, J., Matzke, D., & Wagenmakers, E. (2015). Model comparison and the principle of parsimony. Oxford Handbook of Computational and Mathematical Psychology, 300–317.
Mistry, P., Trueblood, J., Vandekerckhove, J., & Pothos, E. (2015). A latent-mixture quantum probability model of causal reasoning within a Bayesian inference framework. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
Salum, G., Sergeant, J., Sonuga-Barke, E., Vandekerckhove, J., Gadelha, A., Pan, P., Moriyama, T., Graeff-Martins, A., Gomes de Alvarenga, P., do Rosario, M., Manfro, G., Polanczyk, G., & Rohde, L. (2014). Specificity of basic information processing and inhibitory control in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Psychological Medicine, 44, 617–631.
Salum, G., Sergeant, J., Sonuga-Barke, E., Vandekerckhove, J., Gadelha, A., Pan, P., Moriyama, T., Graeff-Martins, A., Gomes de Alvarenga, P., do Rosario, M., Manfro, G., Polanczyk, G., & Rohde, L. (2014). Mechanisms underpinning inattention and hyperactivity: neurocognitive support for ADHD dimensionality. Psychological Medicine, 44, 3189–3201.
Guan, M., Lee, M., & Silva, A. (2014). Threshold models of human decision making on optimal stopping problems in different environments. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
Oravecz, Z., Vandekerckhove, J., & Batchelder, W. (2014). Bayesian Cultural Consensus Theory. Field Methods, 26, 207–222.
Wiech, K., Vandekerckhove, J., Zaman, J., Tuerlinckx, F., Vlaeyen, J., & Tracey, I. (2014). Influence of prior information on pain involves biased perceptual decision-making. Current Biology, 24, R679–R681.
Murphy, P., Vandekerckhove, J., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2014). Pupil-linked arousal determines variability in perceptual decision making. PLOS Computational Biology, 10, e1003854.
Lee, M., Newell, B., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2014). Modeling the adaptation of search termination in human decision making. Decision, 1, 223–251.
Zhang, S., Lee, M., Vandekerckhove, J., Maris, G., & Wagenmakers, E. (2014). Time-varying boundaries for diffusion models of decision making and response time. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1364.
Dutilh, G., Forstmann, B., Vandekerckhove, J., & Wagenmakers, E. (2013). A diffusion model account of age differences in posterror slowing. Psychology and Aging, 28, 64–76.
Chubb, C., Dickson, C., Dean, T., Fagan, C., Mann, D., Wright, C., Guan, M., Silva, A., Gregersen, P., & Kowalsky, E. (2013). Bimodal distribution of performance in discriminating major/minor modes. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134, 3067–3078.
Dutilh, G., Vandekerckhove, J., Forstmann, B., Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & Wagenmakers, E. (2012). Testing theories of post-error slowing. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 7, 454–465.
Oravecz, Z., Tuerlinckx, F., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2011). A hierarchical latent stochastic differential equation model for affective dynamics. Psychological Methods, 16, 468–490.
Vandekerckhove, J., Tuerlinckx, F., & Lee, M. (2011). Hierarchical diffusion models for two-choice response times. Psychological Methods, 16, 44–62.
Vandekerckhove, J., Verheyen, S., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2010). A crossed random effects diffusion model for speeded semantic categorization data. Acta Psychologica, 133, 269–282.
Wetzels, R., Vandekerckhove, J., Tuerlinckx, F., & Wagenmakers, E. (2010). Bayesian parameter estimation in the Expectancy Valence model of the Iowa gambling task. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54, 14–27.
Dutilh, G., Vandekerckhove, J., Tuerlinckx, F., & Wagenmakers, E. (2009). A diffusion model decomposition of the practice effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 1026–1036.
Oravecz, Z., Tuerlinckx, F., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2009). A hierarchical Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model for continuous repeated measurement data. Psychometrika, 74, 395–418.
Panis, S., De Winter, J., Vandekerckhove, J., & Wagemans, J. (2008). Identification of everyday objects on the basis of fragmented versions of outlines. Perception, 37, 271–289.
Vandekerckhove, J., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2008). Diffusion Model Analysis with MATLAB: A DMAT Primer. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 61–72.
Vandekerckhove, J., Tuerlinckx, F., & Lee, M. (2008). A Bayesian approach to diffusion process models of decision-making. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 1429–1434.
Vandekerckhove, J., Panis, S., & Wagemans, J. (2007). The concavity effect is a compound of local and global effects. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 1253–1260.
Spruyt, A., Hermans, D., De Houwer, J., Vandekerckhove, J., & Eelen, P. (2007). On the predictive validity of indirect attitude measures: Prediction of consumer choice behavior on the basis of affective priming in the picture--picture naming task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 599–610.
Vandekerckhove, J., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2007). Fitting the Ratcliff diffusion model to experimental data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 1011–1026.