all in press preprint 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007
Heshmati, S., Oravecz, Z., Pressman, S., Batchelder, W., Muth, C., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2019). What does it mean to feel loved? Cultural agreement and individual differences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36, 214-243.
Dutilh, G., Annis, J., Brown, S., Cassey, P., Evans, N., Grasman, R., Hawkins, G., Heathcote, A., Holmes, W., Krypotos, A., Kupitz, C., Leite, F., Lerche, V., Lin, Y., Logan, G., Palmeri, T., Starns, J., Trueblood, J., van Maanen, L., van Ravenzwaaij, D., Vandekerckhove, J., Visser, I., Voss, A., White, C., Wiecki, T., Rieskamp, J., & Donkin, C. (2019). The quality of response time data inference: A blinded, collaborative approach to the validity of cognitive models. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26, 1051–1069.
Schubert, A., Nunez, M., Hagemann, D., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2019). Individual differences in cortical processing speed predict cognitive abilities: A model-based cognitive neuroscience account. Computational Brain & Behavior, 2, 64–84.
Lee, M., Criss, A., Devezer, B., Donkin, C., Etz, A., Leite, F., Matzke, D., Rouder, J., Trueblood, J., White, C., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2019). Robust modeling in cognitive science. Computational Brain & Behavior, 2, 141–153.
Nunez, M., Gosai, A., Vandekerckhove, J., & Srinivasan, R. (2019). The latency of a visual evoked potential tracks the onset of decision making. NeuroImage, 197, 93–108.
Vandekerckhove, J., White, C., Trueblood, J., Rouder, J., Matzke, D., Leite, F., Etz, A., Donkin, C., Devezer, B., Criss, A., & Lee, M. (2019). Robust diversity in cognitive science. Computational Brain & Behavior, 2, 271–276.
all ip pp '23 '22 '21 '20 '19 '18 '17 '16 '15 '14 '13 '12 '11 '10 '09 '08 '07
Heshmati, S., Oravecz, Z., Pressman, S., Batchelder, W., Muth, C., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2019). What does it mean to feel loved? Cultural agreement and individual differences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36, 214-243.
Dutilh, G., Annis, J., Brown, S., Cassey, P., Evans, N., Grasman, R., Hawkins, G., Heathcote, A., Holmes, W., Krypotos, A., Kupitz, C., Leite, F., Lerche, V., Lin, Y., Logan, G., Palmeri, T., Starns, J., Trueblood, J., van Maanen, L., van Ravenzwaaij, D., Vandekerckhove, J., Visser, I., Voss, A., White, C., Wiecki, T., Rieskamp, J., & Donkin, C. (2019). The quality of response time data inference: A blinded, collaborative approach to the validity of cognitive models. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26, 1051–1069.
Schubert, A., Nunez, M., Hagemann, D., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2019). Individual differences in cortical processing speed predict cognitive abilities: A model-based cognitive neuroscience account. Computational Brain & Behavior, 2, 64–84.
Lee, M., Criss, A., Devezer, B., Donkin, C., Etz, A., Leite, F., Matzke, D., Rouder, J., Trueblood, J., White, C., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2019). Robust modeling in cognitive science. Computational Brain & Behavior, 2, 141–153.
Nunez, M., Gosai, A., Vandekerckhove, J., & Srinivasan, R. (2019). The latency of a visual evoked potential tracks the onset of decision making. NeuroImage, 197, 93–108.
Vandekerckhove, J., White, C., Trueblood, J., Rouder, J., Matzke, D., Leite, F., Etz, A., Donkin, C., Devezer, B., Criss, A., & Lee, M. (2019). Robust diversity in cognitive science. Computational Brain & Behavior, 2, 271–276.